Assemble 2.0 TutorialBrief Description | First Example | Fundamental difference between non-overlapping fragments and substructure constraints | Atom Tags | Assemble as a tool in structure elucidation | Ranking | Postprocessing
Ranking according to nmr spectral informationAssemble accepts structural, not spectral information. The interpretation task is the responsibility of the user. It does not mean, that all the interpretation is done manually. There are tools available to automatically transform spectral into structural information. Two of them have been connected to Assemble. Such interpretation aids can be of great value, but their strength also bears a certain danger of misinterpretation. There is almost always a certain amount of doubt what a spectral feature means in terms of connectivity between atoms. Occasionally also experts make mistakes. Automatic procedures are no more reliable. The user is still responsible for the correctness of the predictions. Use the tools with care.
![]() Depending on the type of your hardware, the calculation may take a few seconds up to several minutes. The result is shown in a window very similar to the ordinary Assemble output window. ![]() As you see, the correct structure ranks first with a mean deviation of 1.20 ppm. The designation 6/6/6 means that 6 shifts (all of them) have been mapped to carbon atoms. The structure is predicted to have 6 signals in the C-13 nmr spectrum (the second number) and finally the third "6" specifies the number of signals you just specified as experimental shifts. The maximum deviation amounts to 2.30 ppm. This number is very moderate. It is typical for a correct structure. When these figures are compared to those of the structure ranked second, it becomes apparent that the wrong structure, and all others ranking below, show much larger deviations. This is a strong hint to accept the first structure as being the correct solution. Ranking according to the H-1 nmr spectrum Switch to the "H NMR" method and click the "Set Example" button as you did before. ![]() The H-1 nmr spectral information is given as the chemical shift of the signals and their integral. A coupling pattern may be specified in addition. If you don't want to specify a coupling pattern, enter the letter "m" (multiplet). Here is the shift information from the experimental spectrum ready to be copied.
Start the calculation by clicking the "Calculate" button. ![]() The window popping up shows the ranking results. ![]() The structures look strange. In addition the text in the output fields, written in red, says "Error: Shift prediction not possible". What happened? When you look at the first field, you also see "0/10/10". This means that not a single shift has been mapped to any hydrogen atom in the structure. All values are outside the acceptable shift interval for the particular combinations of chemical environment and signal integral. This indicates a very unprobable candidate. Why does it rank first? It is a measure of security. Sometimes the shifts of the correct solution cannot be estimated adequately due to insufficient information about its chemical environments. If this happens, you are very likely to miss the correct solution. This is the worst possible outcome. Therefore these structures are shown first, so you are warned. The 7th structure is the first one for which no error is reported. Two of the experimental shifts are mapped (ore one shift with integral 2). As there is ample choice for so few mappings, the mean and maximum deviations tend to be small. Therefore these structures rank very high, though the bad mapping again shows the structure to be an improbable candidate. When you look at the next set of structures, ranking 10th to 18th, you see the first structure to be the correct solution. The results are shown as text in blue color. The mean and maximum deviations are 0.13 ppm and 0.34 ppm respectively. All the shifts have been mapped to the hydrogens of the molecule. ![]() The color of the text gives you a hint about the quality of the spectrum estimation.
To see the next entry written in blue, you have to step forward to the structure ranking 58th. ![]() The mean and maximum deviations are still quite reasonable, which is also the case for the next few entries with all shifts mapped. Therefore the result of the ranking is not as striking as in the former example using the C-13 nmr spectrum. If you don't want the structures without predicted shifts to be reported at the beginning, you can request they appear at the end of the list. Select the radio button next to "at the end of ranking result" as shown. ![]() Repeat the calculation. The correct structure now ranks 5th. ![]() Brief Description | First Example | Fundamental difference between non-overlapping fragments and substructure constraints | Atom Tags | Assemble as a tool in structure elucidation | Ranking | Postprocessing |